GROENLAND : le nouveau Far West
Groenland : le Nouveau Far West
Notre-Dame de Paris : A Manufactured Middle Ages
Notre-Dame de Paris : A Manufactured Middle Ages
GROENLAND : le nouveau Far West
Groenland : le Nouveau Far West
Notre-Dame de Paris : A Manufactured Middle Ages
Notre-Dame de Paris : A Manufactured Middle Ages
 
 
 

Portrait of a woman. Multicolour collage.
Le Cours Julien in Marseille. Photo by the author.

Urban art is as old as our cities.
Walls have always been the media
of rebels, poets and merchants.
Contemporary street art shakes up
the relationship that urbanites,
both the most privileged and the
outcasts, maintain with works of
art. Creativity is no longer the
expression of an elite exhibiting
itself to another elite, in places
dedicated to cultural and
commercial exchange, from which
the vast majority of the public is
excluded. Street art exposes the
urban masses to its humour, its
revolt, and often, its incredible
virtuosity. The beholder of the work
is no longer in front of it but rather
in it and part of it.

Act fast. Faster. As if the temptation to take your time could empty the work of its substance.

A corner of a wall splashed with sunlight and shadows has brought to a halt Swing Forain’s aimless wandering on a street in the Paris neighbourhood of Marseille. In the graffiti artist’s backpack, the clinking of aerosol paint cans knocking against one another has stopped.

The artist assesses simultaneously the final execution of his tag and the risk he is taking painting on a wall in broad daylight. The law stipulates a fine of 1,500 to 30,000 euros and a two-year prison sentence for people found guilty of defacing public property. A toger’s talent, virtuosity, and the force and originality of the message carried by their graffiti are not accepted as extenuating circumstances. The law does not believe that talent absolves anyone of the offence of unauthorized use of public space.

Passers-by watch the graffiti artist line up his aerosol cans. In an instant, a whole arsenal of colours appears before their eyes. Meagre and formidable weapons in the crime of urban art. People make comments, call out to him, with kindness and curiosity. Already, the first green streaks mingle with the ochre of the old wall. Nothing more can be heard but the whistle of the spurting paint. No one protests or threatens to call the police. On the contrary, a few bystanders offer to serve as lookouts, to keep him from getting caught in the act.

Fig. 1. Urban artists, formerly considered a curse, are now courted by business people. Store windows are turned into creative spaces.
Photo by the author.

Fig. 2. Collage, Panier neighbourhood, Marseille. Summer 2015. The message sent by this collage takes on its full meaning in this Marseille neighbourhood undergoing an accelerated process of gentrification.
Photo by the author.

Street artists, as distinguished from taggers, are obsessed with achieving mastery over their creative gesture. Swing Forain, an artist originally from the impoverished outskirts of Paris, tirelessly practises his scales before “laying down” one of his works on a wall.

Fig. 3. Marseille artist Swing Forain.
Photo by the author.

Fig. 4. Portrait of a woman. Poster stuck to a wall. Photo by the author.

Fig. 5. Portrait of a woman. Stencilled work by the French artist Christian Guémy,
alias C215.
Photo by the author.

Fig. 6. Portrait of man with cigarette. Stencilled work by the French artist Christian Guémy, alias C215. Photo by the author.

Fig. 7. Mural painting, Panier neighbourhood, celebrating the bad reputation, past and present, of the residents of the centre of the city of Marseille. Photo by the author.

Fig. 8. Mural painting. The art of tagging has gradually become emancipated from any attempt at legibility. The artist’s signature or message is subordinated to their skill at mastering explosions of colour.
Photo by the author.

Street artists, as distinguished from taggers, are obsessed with achieving mastery over their creative gesture. Swing Forain, an artist originally from the impoverished outskirts of Paris, tirelessly practises his scales before “laying down” one of his works on a wall.

Walls have become an eye-popping bazaar where only the nobler feelings are displayed. Love, humour, respect for life, hunger for freedom, the beauty of bodies and feminine mystery await the onlooker at every street corner. The passer-by, whom the pioneers of street art imagined as a rebel whose consciousness had been raised, is now simply filled with wonder, and pointlessly so !
A few guardians of the temple cry treason. The Infamous Banksy rants against those who have forgotten that urban art does not exist unless it is illegal. Illegality defines that urban and cultural revolution, which, Banksy continues, “Is exciting only when it attacks property and boredom”. To agree to practice one’s art on authorized walls is to sleep in view of the enemy, who makes the everyday universally ugly with their billboard campaigns and practices social control with their millions of surveillance cameras.
 
“Without the defacement of property, there is no street art, just plain art!” inveighs Banksy, who mocks those who give up the permanent state of insurrection a bit too quickly: “To ask permission to paint on other people’s walls is to ask permission to pick up the stone that has just been flung straight at your head !”

Fig. 10. Fresco with rat by an unknown artist. Le Cours Julien. Marseille. Summer 2015.
Photo by the author.

Fig. 11. Street art embraces action to retake the urban space colonized by advertising.
Photo by the author.

The farewell to revolt is a first stage in the digestion of street art by the urban authorities. The process is already so far advanced that in all the cities that were centres of urban art, these works have become factors in the gentrification of neighbourhoods. The promoters who so vehemently called on the police to neutralize the aerosol and stencil guerrillas now mandate artists to produce frescoes that will contribute not a little to the value of their real estate development projects. Advertisers, whom the street art movement had named its worst enemies, now exploit this fabulous lode of beauty. Banks are no longer hesitant to exhibit fragments of frescoes painted on the fences at work sites. Street art sparks enthusiasm, and there is no end of assessments as to its potential for institutional and commercial communication.

In that mad rush toward urban art, galleries and museums still look like latecomers. The art market has difficulty assessing the works, displaying them, certifying them and distributing them. The best artists, the intransigent Banksy in the lead, persist in their obsession with anonymity, showing contempt for the anguish of dealers who take great risks marketing works that anyone at all could claim as their own – or disavow.

That anonymity, so fiercely defended by some, is in the first place simply a precautionary measure. In not claiming their works, street artists hope for the dismissal of countless complaints, made against them at a time when promoters did not pray that a Banksy, Swoon, Vhils or a few dozen other geniuses of urban art would come put a work on one of their walls. It will take some time before the justice system falls in step with public tastes and urban developers’ political savvy.

In November 2015 the French artist Invaders, whose mosaics now command between 200,000 and 300,000 euros, was arrested by the New York police for having defaced a wall without authorization, despite being a global brand.

Yet the urban artists’ search for anonymity cannot be reduced to their hope of seeing the charges against them dropped, for lack of a defendant to drag before the judge. The first commandment of street art is the primacy of the work over the artist. The genius, however insolent they may be, must not be an obstacle between the object exhibited in the street and its audience. The high priests of street art abominate the idea that artists might be creatures aloof from teeming humanity, which is left behind by obscure concepts skilfully elaborated by fashionable art dealers and their battalions of press attachés. A masterpiece of street art must exert its force as is, by its quality and the relevance of its interaction with its urban and human environment.

The art market is going all out to establish a framework that would allow it to sell the works of the best representatives of street art at their true value. Banksy, whose works are at present the most highly rated, is delighted, lurking in an anonymity scientifically organized to dynamite all attempts at organizing the market. The English artist slashes prices, selling off for a pittance works that gallery owners are dying to be able to market for small fortunes. Severalton walls bearing stencils by Banksy have been dismantled in Palestine and England, to be sold to enthusiastic collectors. In reaction, Banksy mars the pleasure of his wealthiest aficionados by keeping alive a painful ambiguity about the paternity of their acquisitions.

Fig. 12 and 13. In offering street artists the Pont des Arts, below the windows of the Louvre, Paris acknowledged the victory of the visual revolution begun fifty years ago in the black ghettoes of American cities. Photo by the author.